The Purpose of War According to George Orwell (1984)

The primary aim of modern warfare is to use up the products of the machine without raising the general standard of living. Ever since the end of the nineteenth century, the problem of what to do with the surplus of consumption goods has been latent in industrial society. From the moment when the machine first made its appearance it was clear to all thinking people that the need for human drudgery, and therefore to a great extent for human inequality, had disappeared. If the machine were used deliberately for that end, hunger, overwork, dirt, illiteracy, and disease could be eliminated within a few generations. And in fact, without being used for any such purpose, but by a sort of automatic process — by producing wealth which it was sometimes impossible not to distribute — the machine did raise the living standards of the average humand being very greatly over a period of about fifty years at the end of the nineteenth and the beginning of the twentieth centuries. But it was also clear that an all-round increase in wealth threatened the destruction — indeed, in some sense was the destruction — of a hierarchical society. In a world in which everyone worked short hours, had enough to eat, lived in a house with a bathroom and a refrigerator, and possessed a motor-car or even an aeroplane, the most obvious and perhaps the most important form of inequality would already have disappeared. If it once became general, wealth would confer no distinction. It was possible, no doubt, to imagine a society in which wealth, in the sense of personal possessions and luxuries, should be evenly distributed, while power remained in the hands of a small privileged caste. But in practice such a society could not long remain stable. For if leisure and security were enjoyed by all alike, the great mass of human beings who are normally stupefied by poverty would become literate and would learn to think for themselves; and when once they had done this, they would sooner or later realize that the privileged minority had no function, and they would sweep it away. In the long run, a hierarchical society was only possible on a basis of poverty and ignorance.

To return to the agricultural past, as some thinkers about the beginning of the twentieth century dreamed of doing, was not a practicable solution. It conflicted with the tendency towards mechanization which had become quasi-instinctive throughout almost the whole world, and moreover, any country which remained industrially backward was helpless in a military sense and was bound to be dominated, directly or indirectly, by its more advanced rivals. Nor was it a satisfactory solution to keep the masses in poverty by restricting the output of goods. This happened to a great extent during the final phase of capitalism, roughly between 1920 and 1940. The economy of many countries was allowed to stagnate, land went out of cultivation, capital equipment was not added to, great blocks of the population were prevented from working and kept half alive by State charity. But this, too, entailed military weakness, and since the privations it inflicted were obviously unnecessary, it made opposition inevitable. The problem was how to keep the wheels of industry turning without increasing the real wealth of the world. Goods must be produced, but they must not be distributed. And in practice the only way of achieving this was by continuous warfare. The essential act of war is destruction, not necessarily of human lives, but of the products of human labour. War is a way of shattering to pieces, or pouring into the stratosphere, or sinking in the depths of the sea, materials which might otherwise be used to make the masses too comfortable, and hence, in the long run, too intelligent. Even when weapons of war are not actually destroyed, their manufacture is still a convenient way of expending labour power without producing anything that can be consumed. A Floating Fortress, for example, has locked up in it the labour that would build several hundred cargo-ships. Ultimately it is scrapped as obsolete, never having brought any material benefit to anybody, and with further enormous labours another Floating Fortress is built.

In principle the war effort is always so planned as to eat up any surplus that might exist after meeting the bare needs of the population. In practice the needs of the population are always underestimated, with the result that there is a chronic shortage of half the necessities of life; but this is looked on as an advantage. It is deliberate policy to keep even the favoured groups somewhere near the brink of hardship, because a general state of scarcity increases the importance of small privileges and thus magnifies the distinction between one group and another. By the standards of the early twentieth century, even a member of the Inner Party lives an austere, laborious kind of life. Nevertheless, the few luxuries that he does enjoy his large, well-appointed flat, the better texture of his clothes, the better quality of his food and drink and tobacco, his two or three servants, his private motor-car or helicopter—set him in a different world from a member of the Outer Party, and the members of the Outer Party have a similar advantage in comparison with the submerged masses whom we call ’the proles’. The social atmosphere is that of a besieged city, where the possession of a lump of horseflesh makes the difference between wealth and poverty. And at the same time the consciousness of being at war, and therefore in danger, makes the handing-over of all power to a small caste seem the natural, unavoidable condition of survival.


Technorati Tags:


47 thoughts on “The Purpose of War According to George Orwell (1984)

  1. Pingback: The reason you are forced to toil – How Much Is Your Life Worth

  2. Great goods from you, man. I’ve be aware your stuff prior to
    and you are simply too fantastic. I really like what you’ve acquired right here,
    really like what you’re stating and the best way during which you are saying it.
    You make it enjoyable and you continue to take care of to stay it
    smart. I can’t wait to read much more from you. This is really a wonderful web site.

  3. War creates jobs which creates wealth for those in the business of making products for war.. The true beneficiaries of war are those who create wars for political and economic gain.

  4. Very nice post. I just stumbled upon your weblog and wished
    to say that I’ve truly enjoyed surfing around your weblog posts.
    After all I wilkl be subscribing to yoir feed andd I am hoping youu write once more soon!

  5. Pingback: Usury: Weapon of Control and Enslavement – Part 2 of 2 - A Sheep No More

  6. Pingback: Should Colombia’s Military Industry Grow in a Post-Conflict Scenario? - Colombia Star

  7. Pingback: Q Travel Blog » Should Colombia’s Military Industry Grow in a Post-Conflict Scenario?

  8. Pingback: The Execution of Martin Luther King, Jr. - Banoosh

  9. Pingback: The Execution of Martin Luther King, Jr. | A Political Statement

  10. Pingback: Usury: Weapon of Control and Enslavement – Part 2 of 2 | CounterPsyOps

  11. Pingback: Paul Adams, J.D. ~ Usury: Weapon Of Control And Enslavement – Part 2 Of 2 | Shift Frequency

  12. Pingback: Die Enteignung kommt… | Morbus ignorantia - Die Krankheit Unwissen

  13. Pingback: Anonymous

  14. Pingback: Usury: Weapon of Control and Enslavement – Part 1 and 2 | WeBeFree!

  15. Pingback: Usury: Weapon of Control and Enslavement – Part 2 of 2

  16. Pingback: Banoosh » » Usury: Weapon of Control and Enslavement – Part 2 of 2

  17. Pingback: Usury: Weapon of Control and Enslavement – Part 2 of 2 |

  18. Pingback: ActivistPost – Paul Adams. J.D. – Usury: Weapon Of Control And Enslavement – Part 2/2 – 5 November 2013 | Lucas 2012 Infos

  19. Pingback: Usury: Weapon of Control and Enslavement – Part 2 of 2 | The Daily News Report

  20. Human

    Copyright is another form of war i.e. war on people’s minds restricting access to understanding.

    True human doesn’t care about copyrights, but sheeps anvying become masters do.

    1. I actually read the book, 1984, by George Orwell. This article that you are complimenting is directly from the book, when the protagonist is reading something to help him reach his goals. This article has absolutely nothing except what Orwell wrote, meaning that it was easily posted, requiring only copying and pasting Orwell’s ideas.

  21. This purpose would be an interesting juxtaposition with Johnny GB Tyler’s Plan for World Peace and production as found in the last chapter of B-Field Earth by LRH.

    Let me know if you would like data on the enhancement of life and living better longer. I hope it will help many, Fred…

    Caio! <<< Wm

  22. Hello! I followed an old link of mine and reread this. Correct me if I’m wrong but the words in this post are your own, in which you summarize Orwell’s illustration of the real purposes of modern war. Right? I would like to include a passage from here and want to be sure to credit it properly. :)

    Also, nice to see that you’re still blogging. Many times when I click on an old link that blogger has disappeared. I myself have moved blogs several times…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s